Showing posts with label Squealers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Squealers. Show all posts

Friday, September 25, 2009

MSM: Squealer Incarnate

Often, in order to define or understand some modern-day phenomenon, it is instructive to refer to the writings that have withstood the test of time.

It is hard to imagine a more appropriate and revealing application of that truism than the use of George Orwell's Animal Farm to illustrate what is going on in America today.  The parallels between Orwell's characters and the current elements of government, other political institutions, and assorted enablers are eerily and precisely striking.  It is almost as if Orwell was sitting at a keyboard only yesterday, writing about a  21st century farm, America, instead of at a typewriter in 1943-44, addressing the Russian Revolution of some ninety years ago.

Although it would be a highly interesting exercise to identify and thoroughly develop the 2009 characters, my intent is to only provide the definitive answer to an exercise generated by Bernard Goldberg a few days ago, namely, what the best name for today's media, which clearly no longer is reflective of main stream America.

Well, Mr. Goldberg, I submit for your consideration the term Squealer Incarnate, or Squealer for short, as the perfect name for the collective socialism enablers at NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, AP, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.! etc.! etc.!

The evidence to support my recommendation follows in the form of character descriptions from two sources.  I have bold-ed the parts of their descriptions/summaries that I feel are particularly pertinent:

          "Squealer

          Throughout his career, Orwell explored how politicians manipulate language in an age of
           mass media. In Animal Farm, the silver-tongued pig Squealer abuses language
           to justify Napoleon’s actions and policies to the proletariat by whatever means
           seem necessary. By radically simplifying language—as when he teaches the   
           sheep to bleat “Four legs good, two legs better!”—he limits the terms of debate. 
           By complicating language unnecessarily, he confuses and intimidates the 
           uneducated, as when he explains that pigs, who are the “brainworkers” of the 
           farm, consume milk and apples not for pleasure, but for the good of their 
           comrades. In this latter strategy, he also employs jargon (“tactics, tactics”) as 
           well as a baffling vocabulary of false and impenetrable statistics, engendering in 
           the other animals both self-doubt and a sense of hopelessness about ever 
           accessing the truth without the pigs’ mediation. Squealer’s lack of conscience 
           and unwavering loyalty to his leader, alongside his rhetorical skills, make him   
           the perfect propagandist for any tyranny. Squealer’s name also fits him well: 
           squealing, of course, refers to a pig’s typical form of vocalization, and Squealer’s 
           speech defines him. At the same time, to squeal also means to betray, aptly 
           evoking Squealer’s behavior with regard to his fellow animals."



           "Squealer: Squealer is an intriguing character in Orwell's Animal Farm.  He's first 
           described as a manipulator and persuader.  Orwell narrates, "He could turn 
           black into white."  Many critics correlate Squealer with the Pravda, the Russian
           newspaper of the 1930's.  Propaganda was a key to many publications, and since 
           their was no television or radio, the newspaper was the primary source of media 
           information.  So the monopoly of the Pravda was seized by Stalin and his new
           Bolshevik regime.  In Animal Farm, Squealer, like the newspaper, is the link 
           between Napoleon and other animals.  When Squealer masks an evil intention of 
           the pigs, the intentions of the communists can be carried out with little 
           resistance  and without political disarray.  ..."

I suggest that every concerned American read, or re-read, Animal Farm, or at least go to one of these sites and brush up on what George Orwell was saying about totalitarian governments.

And start calling the "MSM" Squealer - it will get under their skin, I'll bet!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Advice for Grover

This from the November 6, 2008, Townhall column by Michael R. Blood, entitled "Can Palin Resurrect the GOP?  Does She Want To?"

"Grover Norquist, a leading conservative and president of Americans for Tax Reform, called Palin "one of five or six people who is a plausible candidate for president in 2012," along with familiar names like Mitt Romney, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich."

A leading conservative, is Grover?  Is he a "leading conservative" in the mold of those who abandoned the party's candidate when the going got tough?  A suggestion, Grover.  Maybe you should look over your shoulder and see where the unwashed masses are heading, so you can run over and get in front of us.  If you try to force more of that elitest moderate claptrap on us, you may very well find that we have decided that a new party is the way to go. 

Sarah Palin has earned the right to be the leading candidate for the next election, if she feels like putting up with the Squealers  and the back-biters in the McCain staff (what a bunch of clowns!).  Frankly, I will not blame her if she decides to stay in Alaska to shoot moose.  That Grover dismisses her as one of five or six does not inspire much confidence in me that they learned anything.

Newt Gingrich is, to my mind, a true conservative hero, but, for whatever reason, he effectively chose to sit this one out.  He has some mending to do to get me interested in picking him over Sarah.

I don't know much about Romney, other than his religion.  I suspect that item alone will inspire enough divisiveness within the party to render him as less than a true force in a battle to unseat an incumbent, even a socialist.

Rick Perry is a grub!  An ultimate RINO!  He spearheaded a drive to add a new tax on the profits of businesses here in Texas, and, through his own personal leadership, got it passed.  I'll bet you $5.00 right now that he would not even carry Texas!

So, if you can find someone who is better than Sarah, and who convinces me that he is better, so be it.  I will be happy to support that person.  But beware of buying into the feeding frenzy that is trying desperately trying to discredit Sarah Palin, and be very cautious about trying to cut her legs from under her.  We, the non-leading conservatives, may not be nearly as stupid as you think.  The Independent Party (or some other) may find it's ranks swelling with dis-enfranchised Republicans.